Show summary
Ethiopia and its people have been experiencing internal conflicts that have caused many deaths, property destruction, and other tragedies. The main causes of these internal conflicts were the country’s internal political instability and scarce resources, its historical paths, its geographical location, and the current religious fundamentalism in the Horn of Africa. In this research, these internal conflicts were classified into four groups: ethnic, religious, National Power \ Regional Predominance (NP\RP), and Other minor incidents, based on their formation, intensity, and nature. This dissertation’s overarching purpose is to examine how these internal conflicts were reported in selected Ethiopian local newspapers, namely, Addis Admas, Reporter, The Daily Monitor, and The Ethiopian Herald, in the period 2005-2013. The sampled newspapers were deliberately selected because they have been published for many years, are interested in dealing with critical issues and current affairs, and have relatively large circulations within the country. Similarly, the period (2005-2013) was intentionally chosen because it included several conflicts. To meet the main objectives of the dissertation, three main research questions were set. These are: To what extent do the selected newspapers cover the internal conflicts? How do they frame the stories, and what are the challenges they face during reporting on these cases? The study answered these major questions using content analysis, textual analysis, and instruments for collecting and analysing interview data. The content analysis was used to consider the extent of the internal conflict stories that appeared in the selected newspapers. The textual analysis was also employed to discover how the newspapers frame the internal conflicts. The interviews were added to the study to make sense of the reasons for which the selected newspapers reported in the way they did. The study was supported by agenda-setting, framing, and symbolic annihilation theories. The former two theories were employed to develop the tools of the study, to identify the problems, and to support the discussions. The latter, however, was merely used to discuss the data. The study reveals that internal conflict reporting in the selected Ethiopian newspapers was not only minimal in number but also tended to silence cases by ignoring some of the issues or facts of the events in their stories. The frame analysis also reflects that the texts try to hide some of the important elements of the events relating to the internal conflicts. Two frames, the annihilation frame and the attribution of responsibility, are identified in the study. The study also identifies that Ethiopian local newspapers and their journalists, in general, and those in the selected newspapers, in particular, have been facing challenges, mainly in relation to ownership, fear, self-censorship and pressures, which lead reporters to compromise their professional integrity while reporting on cases of internal conflicts. Looking at the overall findings, the study also outlines the possible practical and theoretical implications for the Ethiopian media and, more generally, for media and conflict reporting.